Search This Blog

Tuesday, June 19, 2018

Thoughts on the Estate Tax


There are many people who want to abolish the Estate Tax. They call it the Death Tax. They say it is double-taxation, adding a tax on money that has already been taxed as income. I disagree with these people.

The Estate Tax is not double-taxation. It is a tax on property, not on income. Once we die, our wealth becomes property in the form of an Estate. And property can be and often is taxed multiple times. Consider the property tax we pay on our homes and land. We pay this tax annually. And the ad velorum tax paid on registered automobiles.
 
So the double-taxation argument is invalid, in my opinion.

Now there is also a principle in play from the time of the founding of our country. That is the anathema of an entrenched wealthy class of citizens. The Founders fought against this in the form of rejecting any kind of royalty or aristocracy. In fact, the existence of property taxes, on land especially, is one way to limit the accumulated wealth of an aristocracy. In the United States, land is always taxed. So one cannot simply accumulate land and have it sit, unused. The land needs to be put to productive use in order to generate income to pay its share of annual property tax.

In a similar way, we as a society want to limit the ability of families to pass on wealth from one generation to the next. The inheritance of wealth is a cornerstone of building an aristocracy. So, in America, we encourage and applaud each individual to make the best of what she can. But then we limit what can be passed on to the next generation. The next generation will need to make their own fortune on their own merits.

Some will argue that the Estate tax limits one’s ability to control the destiny of his wealth. When living, I’m able to direct the use of my wealth however I like. But when dead, I’m limited by my Will and by what Estate Tax law allows. My counter argument to this: If you want your money to go somewhere and not be subject to Estate tax, then give it away before you die.

There is wonderful biblical context on the consequence of dying to one’s previous living state. It is put in the form of the effect of death on one’s marriage. While alive, my marriage is a binding contract under law and under God. But as soon as I die, that contract is tossed aside, and all its rules are moot. It’s the same with my wealth. While alive, I can direct my wealth with a great degree of autonomy, subject to the laws of the land. But when I’m dead, what expectation should I have regarding the disposition of my wealth? From a biblical standpoint, I say none.

Friday, December 2, 2016

The Turing Test is finally relevant

I grew up learning about the Turing Test as an intellectual exercise. I understand it, and I think it's a great test. I just never thought I'd need to use it so soon.

I'm getting a lot of automated phone calls now. But the automation is getting more sophisticated - voice-activated delays, pauses in the dialog to simulate human speech patterns, etc.

So now when I pick up the phone I wait before responding. Then I say 'hello' in a flat tone. If there's a robot on the other end, they will launch into their spiel.

But now, the robot is including multiple delays and even giggles. Yes, the robot voice is giggling and telling me that her headphones slipped off (to explain the second delay after her initial 'hello').

I don't like having to run the Turing Test on every phone call. I wanted to run the Turing Test on a real AI-enabled robot, not a pre-programmed marketing call script. Oh well.

And as an aside - I have always pronounced "spiel" as "Shpeel". I assumed it started with sh- or sch-. I guess I've never written the word before. Thank you Google for setting me right.

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

Tuesday, October 1, 2013

Office 2013 icon #rant

I recently down upgraded to MS Office 2013.  And so I went through the process of customizing the menus/ribbons/action panes/ whatever-they're-called-now things along the top of the window.  I like to have both the open and close icons handy and in plain sight.

That's when I noticed that the icons had substantially changed from the 2010 version.  Here are the icons for open and close in MS Office 2010:


Notice how the arrow for open points to the right, and that for close points back to the left.  They are similar in that regard to the do/undo buttons for editing text:


That makes sense to me.  And it is consistent within the icon scheme.

But in office 2013, someone felt it necessary not only to "update" all the icons, but in fact to substantially change their appearance.  While the do/undo icons have remained similar,


the open and close buttons have change to this:


The open button (on the left), has no arrow at all.  The close button (on the right) has reversed the arrow's direction.  In fact, the close icon looks more like the old "open" than the old "close".

What is Microsoft thinking?  First, why in the world must we have changes to the icons with every release.  Second, if you do feel the need to change the icons (it's progress, you know), then at least don't contradict your previous non-verbal cues.  I'm unable to articulate how frustrating this is - how utterly pointless and unproductive these changes are.  To think that there is someone at MS who actually gets paid to come up with this stuff... 

My final point, then, is that if MS feels the driving need to update its icon scheme with every new software version, then why does it keep the same old save icon, which is a picture of a 3.5" floppy disk?  Does anyone under the age of 20 even know what that is?


Rhetorically, then:  How is the world made a better place by the new office 2013 icon scheme?  And if it's not, then why did MS bother to spend the time, money and effort to change it?

Thank you, I feel a bit better now.

Monday, March 25, 2013

Heard on the radio, March 6th talking about positive vs. negative feedback (my paraphrase):

Use positive feedback to build commitment from others toward the mutual goal.  But once the other has ‘bought in’ to the goal, positive feedback has diminishing returns – how much more committed can one get?  At this point, shift to negative feedback.  Negative feedback is more effective at influencing the behaviors of experienced and/or committed stakeholders in a shared goal.

I find this to be true for me – I want to be encouraged as I start a new endeavor, or if I’m unsure whether I’m ‘part of the team’.  But once I’m firmly established in a team, additional encouragement loses its effectiveness.  It feels forced or fake.  Occasional encouragement is nice, but not too much.  However, if I’m called out on a mistake, I become quite determined to prevent that from happening again – I work more diligently to make sure I don’t ‘let down’ the team.

Friday, December 14, 2012

Why don't I blog more?

I have a Blogger account, but I don't use it much.
I have a Twitter account, but I don't use it much.
I have a Facebook account, and I use it more that both previous.
Why?

Twitter's concept, "What are you doing right now?", seems interesting, but has never quite grabbed me as being something I want to use to commit my activity to permanent record.  It seems a bit too trivial.  What are you doing right now?  Well, to be honest, right now I'm writing a Tweet.  Or, to be less literal, I'm sitting around doing not much.  Or walking, or driving, or whatever.  Not earth-shaking stuff.

Facebook's concept, "What's on your mind?", has always seemed more relevant to me.  It's as if I'm sharing something with a friend in the room.  Facebook is a happy medium between fluff (Twitter) and weighty (Blogger).  But I think the big plus is the fact that there are so many people on Facebook.  There's a critical mass of people I know in the same virtual community.  So there's always something new to see, and when I post there's always someone out there who sees it.

Blogging seems to me to convey a higher threshold of content.  By that I mean that blogs are used to record thought-out writings.  More like essays.  If Twitter is a clause, then Facebook is a sentance.  But Blogger is an essay.  And often I just don't feel like having to write an essay.  I just want to write a few sentances.

I guess Facebook has found the right balance for me in communication.  I'm not much of a texter.  That's mostly because I don't have a smart phone.  But also I'm not in the habit of communicating in small bursts.  So maybe I would equate Twitter with texting, or IM.  Then Facebook is more like email.  I use email all the time.  Since I'm familiar with email, Facebook is a more comfortable fit for me.  Then Blogger would be like.. all I can think of is writing an essay.  To me, it implies a more thought-out body of content.

Twitter:  unfiltered stream of words from my mouth.
Facebook:  coherent thoughts on a single subject.
Blogger:  developed thoughts with a bent toward persuasive essay.

And most of the time in my daily activity, Facebook is where I'm at mentally:  coherent thoughts on a single subject.


Friday, July 6, 2012

Intermittent update

Had breakfast with my friend Greg Elliot at the Rexall Grill in Duluth, GA.  Saw Phil Tuttle of Walk Thru the Bible.  Also saw Brooks Coleman, GA State House rep for Duluth.

Monday, June 6, 2011

Packing for trip

Today is packing, last minute laundry, shopping, etc. Scotland, here we come!

Saturday, June 4, 2011

Scotland, here we come

Claire and I leave for Scotland in three days. I intend to keep this blog updated with daily notes from our trip.

Thursday, March 10, 2011

If I had a Twitter account...

Sitting in my quiet-time chair, typing on my new [used] Toshiba netbook - purchased to use on my June trip to Scotland - spending some quiet time in prelude to meeting my Accountability partner for coffee at the Rexall Grill in Duluth.

Ah see, that's much longer than 140 characters. Twitter cannot contain me!

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

What makes America the greatest

“I think it’s quite natural that Americans – all of whom feel that they could have been President if they wanted – like to read about that ultimate fulfillment.”
- Edmund Morris, author of a three volume biography of Theodore Roosevelt, quoted in Time Magazine, November 29, 2010

What is it that’s different about America? What is it that makes us feel that we’re the best nation on the planet? Answers like Freedom and Liberty come to mind. But also more subtle ones like adherence to the rule of law, application of law equally to all citizens, jealous guarding of property rights (think how a loss of property rights would impact the economic choices of investors in America).

Here’s a quote that may point to an underlying cause of the unconscious ‘buy-in’ we Americans have toward out Constitution in particular, and our Country in general. I’ve heard it said that non-Americans can have respect toward America and her people while simultaneously vilifying her leaders. That stems from other countries’ history of a separation between the populace and the leadership. But here in America our government is of, by and for the people. So we have a much more personal stake in government, both local and national. Our stake is not only in the consequences that fall on us from government action or inaction, but more importantly a sense of ownership in the government. It’s almost like a parent-child relationship, where we citizens are the parents and our children-leaders have left the nest to go into the big world. We cheer them on and suffer with them in their defeats. If we were the children and leaders the parents, would we care so much about their accomplishments? No, it’s because we see them as our creation, our responsibility, that we have so much invested in their successes and failures.

The feeling of responsibility is quite natural: we have voted them into office. We are responsible for them. And what parent doesn’t struggle with the desire to step in and do for his child what his child needs to do for himself? But this feeling seems to go beyond a parental responsibility. I find, therefore, a truthiness to Morris’ statement, and some application of it to my questions at the start of this essay. What nation wouldn’t feel itself the greatest whose citizens all feel they could be the leader, if only they weren’t so busy doing other things?

Sunday, August 29, 2010

These two links provide graphic visualizations (in the form of YouTube movied) of the information in

a) source code repositories: http://code.google.com/p/gource/
b) apache log files: http://code.google.com/p/logstalgia/

The geek in me says "Way Cool"!

Saturday, July 17, 2010

Ping

Hello, I'm still alive.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Veritas Google Redux

Here’s a sobering testament to the state of our society. The resulting hits from a Google search on:

“Jesus is Man”: 4,370,000 hits
“Jesus is God”: 246,000 hits

I wonder how many hits I’d get on “The Spiritual decline of America”?

Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Summer Walking in Farmland to be Developed

I can see the flat space, framed by Oaks, where
a house was stood. I can see the line of Hibiscus, where
a lane was run. I can see the Pecan, where
a swing was swung.

I will return in the fall, to gather fruit
from the neglected Apple tree
in the forgotten orchard.

Monday, March 2, 2009

Our Yearly Snowfall

We had our first [/only] snow of the year yesterday. So schools are closed today. We made a snowman in the front yard (sorry, no pic available yet). Our neighbors, childless, made a snowDog in their front yard.

Saturday, December 13, 2008

Gas Prices: $1.369 per gallon!

I am having trouble believing it - I paid $1.36 for gas last night at a Kroger gas station. I feel a bit guilty about gloating, but it just feels so good. :)

Friday, November 7, 2008

Matthew Chapter 9, verse 36

"When he saw the crowds, he had compassion on them, because they were harassed and helpless, like sheep without a shepherd."

Harassed and Helpless - that's what we are. We are Powerless in this world. That's because were fallen flesh in a fallen world. We're helpless to overcome it. That's why we need Jesus - to overcome the world for us.

I grew up with cows and sheep. I must say that sheep are stupid. As a teenager, I felt nothing but contempt for them. I didn't feel compassion for sheep. Sheep will do the wrong thing, go the wrong place - it's maddening. But I did learn that you cannot yell at or bully a sheep to do the right thing. Now a cow you can yell at, and out of fear she'll go the right way. With cows you can motivate them with either carrots or sticks. For sheep, the sticks just don't work. They get all upset and become self-destructive. Yelling at sheep doesn't work either. You need so be patient, calm and confident. You cannot rush sheep. But they will follow you if they know your name and trust you.

And isn't that how we humans are? The stick of the law didn't work for us. We just couldn't follow it to righteousness. We need carrots. We need love. When Jesus sees us, he sees sheep, and feels compassion. He is the Good Shepherd. He will lead us to green pastures.

Yet in my humanness, since I see sheep and feel contempt, I project that emotion on to God. I assume that when he sees me, harassed and helpless, wallowing in the same self-destructive sin again and again, he sees me with contempt. But the Truth is that God sees Jesus, not me. And Jesus sees me with compassion, not contempt. It takes a lot for me to overcome my inate prejudice and believe Jesus actually has compassion for me. I feel shame at my actions. I don't want Him to see them. But he sees and doesn't shame me. He loves me.

So back to the verse: & tie it in with the Celebrate Recovery concept of Powerlessness. I am powerless over my addictions, over my hurts hangups and habits. But instead of feeling shame over this, all I need do is accept that I am a sheep. Normally this would be scary - I wouldn't want to be a sheep out in this world. The world is mean & dangerous. But we have a shepherd. A Good Shepherd - one who calls us by name, etc. And so we can submit ourselves, as sheep, to the shepherd. We can follow his voice. Our alternatives are all self-destructive: we can flail about in panic, damaging ourselves and all around us. Or we can try to fight back against the world - we can gang up with others to fight off the wolves. Can you imagine a group of sheep out in the wild, surrounded by wolves? Can you imagine someone hands them some sticks & rocks and says "come on, fight for yourselves, you outnumber the wolves"? It's ludicrous. So why do we think we can take on the world in our own strength? It's not even a matter of us fighting along side of Jesus. It's a matter of us getting safe behind him, and letting him fight the wolves for us. As a sheep, there's no other way for us. We're just not made for fighting wolves. A right understanding of our relationship to God means we would willingly and gladly get behind Jesus. No sheep would step in front of the shepherd and say "don't worry, I'll fight off this wolf for you". And there's no shame or embarrasment in that.

And yet, there's this lie I keep hearing - a lie about how it's my responsibility to fight the wolf. A lie that I'm less of a man if I'm not able to fight the wolf. A lie that there must be something wrong with me if I'm not able to fight off the wolf. A lie that I'm scared or chicken or weak and that I let others fight for me because I'm a coward. So I need to embrace, instead, the Truth: I am a sheep. I am helpless and harrassed. I am not made for fighting wolves. Jesus is my shepherd. He is made for fighting wolves. My job is to get behind Jesus and be a sheep. And since I am a sheep, I will feel no shame at being one. I will instead be grateful that I have a shepherd.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Election Day

I've given thought & prayer over today's votes. I'm still not clear on the specific votes I will be taking, but one thing is clear: God is Sovereign. Period. So no matter who wins the presidency, and no matter who 'controls' Congress, we need to come to grips with the fact that God's Will is done. That should influence our attitude toward those who assume office in January.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Veritas Google

I Google, and Google sets me free.

Results of some Google Searches, 10/20/2008:

gray: 193,000,000
grey: 183,000,000

potato: 45,700,000
tomato: 41,300,000
eggplant: 9,320,000 - I wouldn't have thought it so high

mccain obama: 110,000,000
biden palin: 21,100,000
mcpalin obiden: 5570
mcbiden opalin: 6

saddam: 25,500,000 - more than biden/palin!
paris hilton: 60,200,000 - that's just shameful

bush nuclear: 3,830,000
bush nucular: 3,810,000 - sad or
bush nuculer: 3,740,000 funny?